Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES, ETC. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 9, 1979No. Civ. A. No. 77-1754Published

1Opinion of the Court

480 F.Supp. 659 (1979)

UNITED STATES of America for Use and Benefit of M. A. BRUDER & SONS, INC., Plaintiff,

v.

AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO., Blake Construction Co. and Harry F. Ah, Jr., Defendants.

Civ. A. No. 77-1754.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

November 9, 1979.

Robert L. Kay, Bethesda, Md., for plaintiff.

Robert N. Jensen, Washington, D. C., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

PENN, District Judge.

The use plaintiff, M. A. Bruder & Sons, Inc. (Bruder), filed this action to recover under a payment bond, for moneys allegedly due it as the result of its contract with William S. Alt…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. JW Bateson Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Bd. of Trustees of Nat. Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States for the Use of Powers Regulator Company v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
  5. United States ex rel. Powers Regulator Co. v. Farina Construction Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API