Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided February 28, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Jesse Gonzales, Jr. Pecos County Attorney 103 West Callaghan Fort Stockton, Texas 79735

Re: Whether a project financed in distinct phases is subject to the competitive bidding requirements of the County Purchasing Act (RQ-0620-GA)

Dear Mr. Gonzales:

You ask with regard to certain purchases in Pecos County:

Whether the County Auditor may present for payment, an invoice for labor, that in the opinion of the County Attorney, has been determined to violate the County Purchasing Act? Specifically, can a project be set up to be performed in "phases" that are each under $25,000 and not be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Joe v. Two Thirty Nine Joint VentureTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Canales v. LaughlinTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Guynes v. Galveston CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Smith v. FlackCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Smith v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API