Legal Opinion

Caiazza v. Tuff Realty Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 16, 2001No. 5D01-544PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORFINGER, R. B., J.

We affirm the trial court’s summary final judgment concluding that the statute of limitations bars enforcement of a 1993 New York decree purporting to determine the ownership of certain shares of stock.

The lawsuit between the parties concerns a dispute over the ownership of stock in Tuff Realty Corporation and 1500 West Church Street Corporation. The complaint filed by Appellees, James M. Guerin, as surviving spouse of Mary N. Guerin, Susan C. Todd, Kathleen Caiazza, Pasquale (Patrick) P. Caiazza, Jr. and Christopher P. Caiazza, alleged that they own all of the disputed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allie v. IonataSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Burshan v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Rybovich Boat Works, Inc. v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. Adams v. AdamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. Admiral Security & Investment Co. v. CurtisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haigh v. Planning Bd. of Town of MedfieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. Desert Palace, Inc. v. WileyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API