Frazier v. Allstate Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSaad, P.J.
i
nature of the case
In this no-fault insurance action, defendant appeals 1 from the trial court’s denial of its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and from the wage-loss and related portions of the judgment for plaintiff. The issue we decide is whether plaintiff, who had been unemployed for nearly four years, was nonetheless eligible for work-loss benefits under MCL 500.3107a; MSA 24.13107(1), as one who is “tempo rarily unemployed.” Because we hold that plaintiff was not “temporarily unemployed,” we reverse and remand.
n
FACTS
Although the injury that forms the basis for this case…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clute v. GENERAL ACCIDENT ASSURANCE COMPANYMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Szabo v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Oikarinen v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- Anton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Lockridge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Andrew S Roskamp v. Fremont Insurance CoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
- Anton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Lockridge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000