Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Allstate Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1998No. Docket 196101PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, P.J.

i

nature of the case

In this no-fault insurance action, defendant appeals 1 from the trial court’s denial of its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and from the wage-loss and related portions of the judgment for plaintiff. The issue we decide is whether plaintiff, who had been unemployed for nearly four years, was nonetheless eligible for work-loss benefits under MCL 500.3107a; MSA 24.13107(1), as one who is “tempo rarily unemployed.” Because we hold that plaintiff was not “temporarily unemployed,” we reverse and remand.

n

FACTS

Although the injury that forms the basis for this case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clute v. GENERAL ACCIDENT ASSURANCE COMPANYMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Szabo v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Oikarinen v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Lockridge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Andrew S Roskamp v. Fremont Insurance CoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Anton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Lockridge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API