Legal Opinion

Matter of Mitchell v. . Prendergast

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 22, 1917, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the comptroller of the city of New York to forthwith audit the payroll for the payment of the salary of the petitioner as under sheriff and acting sheriff of the county of Queens for the first half of the month of February, 1917, and to do each and…

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 22, 1917, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the comptroller of the city of New York to forthwith audit the payroll for the payment of the salary of the petitioner as under sheriff and acting sheriff of the county of Queens for the first half of the month of February, 1917, and to do each and every other act or thing required to be done by said comptroller to cause payment of such salary to be made to…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Cuddeback, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Shirey v. PearsonNew York Supreme Court · 1923
  2. People Ex Rel. Bast v. . VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Longobardi v. OakleyNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Joseph v. CorsiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950
  5. People ex rel. Bast v. VoorhisNew York Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API