Legal Opinion
Syracuse Broadcasting Corp. v. Newhouse
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided January 3, 1963No. Civ. No. 4548PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES T. FOLEY, District Judge.
The defendants move in this prolonged litigation directly for an order by the Court to tax costs and disbursements. The motion is supported by an affidavit in the form of the bill of costs ordinarily submitted to the Clerk of the Court itemizing the nature and amount of costs sought to be taxed as prevailing parties. (Rule 54(d), F.R.Civ.Proc.) The attorneys for both sides seem satisfied to adopt this procedure and bypass the Clerk in the first instance. Judicial authority with reasoned interpretation also sanctions the procedure. (Deering, Milliken & Co. v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Syracuse Broadcasting Corporation v. Samuel I. Newhouse, the Herald Company, the Post-Standard Company and Central New York Broadcasting CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Perlman v. FeldmannDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1953
- Bank of America v. Loew's International CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Syracuse Broadcasting Corporation v. Samuel I. Newhouse, the Herald Company, the Post-Standard Company, and Central New York Broadcasting CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Brookside Theatre Corp. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sankin v. 5410 Connecticut Avenue CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1968
- Refuse & Environmental Systems, Inc. v. Industrial Services of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
- Nelson v. Darragh Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1988
- Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- BDT Prod Inc v. Lexmark Intl IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.