Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Slater

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 28, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Bill in Equity for an account, and to enforce payment of a promissory note. On demurrer to the bill. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMatteson, J.

This is a bill filed in behalf of a married woman by her next friend, to obtain payment of two promissory notes from the estate of William S. Slater, deceased, who in his lifetime was a member of the firm by which the notes were made.

The bill alleges that August 3, 1872, the complainant’s husband, Frank- C. Taylor, John M. Wright, the said William S. Slater, deceased, and Earl P. Mason, also deceased, were engaged in business in Chicago as copartners, under the name and style of Taylor & Wright; that on that date said firm made, indorsed, and negotiated at the Fourth National Bank of Chicago…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. President of the Bank of Alabama v. SimontonTexas Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Martin v. BroachSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  3. Penley v. WaterhouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  4. Lord v. ShalerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1819
  5. Trustees R. E. Bank v. HartfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1844

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Red River Valley National Bank v. BarnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API