Legal Opinion

Richard L. Simon and Fiona Simon v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 13, 1995No. 1708, Docket 94-4237PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINTER, Circuit Judge:

This appeal from the Tax Court raises the question whether professional musicians may take a depreciation deduction for wear and tear on antique violin bows under the Accelerated Cost Recovery System (“ACRS”) of the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 (“ERTA”), Pub.L. No. 97-34, 95 Stat. 172, although the taxpayers cannot demonstrate that the bows have a “determinable useful life.”

The parties agree that under the pre-ERTA Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and the Treasury Department regulations interpreting that Code, the bows would be considered depreciable property only if…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United States v. LudeySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Massey Motors, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Lecroy Research Systems Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. Simon v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hospital Corp. of Am. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1997
  2. Norwest Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1999
  3. Duke Energy Natural Gas Corp. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. Sprint Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1997
  5. Telecom USA Inc v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API