Legal Opinion

Board of County Commissioners v. Alman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 24, 1963No. 32173PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, Justice

This is a workmen’s compensation proceeding in which the petitioner Board seeks review by certiorari of an order of the Full Commission reversing the deputy.

We are asked to decide whether wages earned in dissimilar concurrent employments may be combined for the purpose of determining loss of wage earning capacity incurred as a result of an injury in only one of the employments.

The question must be answered in the negative.

Richard Alman, the claimant, worked full time for the petitioner Board as an animal control officer, i. e. as dog catcher or dog constable. He received a compensable injury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beloff v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. JJ Murphy & Son, Inc. v. GibbsSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  3. Matter of Brandfon v. Beacon Theatre Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Claim of Riccobono v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kerce v. Coca-Cola Company-Foods DivisionSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Brannon v. Tampa TribuneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Parrott v. City of Fort LauderdaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  4. Boree Harvesting v. SandersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Jones Shutter Products, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API