Brown v. State

Appellant, convicted of burglary and grand theft, challenges his conviction for grand theft. He claims that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he was in possession of the stolen items, and nor, he argues, did the state identify specific items of jewelry or their values. As to the latter issue, the matter was not preserved for appeal. As to the former, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction. We thus affirm.

At the non-jury trial, victim Richard Trask testified that at the time of the burglary, he and his wife lived in a ground floor unit at a condominium…