Hoxsie v. Hoxsie
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Grand Traverse. Injunction to restrain a private nuisance. Defendant appeals. The facts are in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The bill in this cause was filed to restrain a private nuisance. The chief complaint made by it was that defendant, wdio was the owner of a saw-mill and foundry on the waters of a stream which empties into Grand Traverse Bay, was accustomed to cast the sawdust into the stream, whereby the water was rendered ■ unfit for use, the valuable fish therein destroyed or driven away, and complainant’s dam for his own mill below gradually filled up. A further grievance, but one which the bill made less prominent, was, that the mill-dam of defendant at times detained the water unreasonably, and at other…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dumont v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Tampa Waterworks Co. v. ClineSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
- Woodin v. WentworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Penn American Plate Glass Co. v. SchwinnIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.