Legal Opinion

Hoxsie v. Hoxsie

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1878PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Grand Traverse. Injunction to restrain a private nuisance. Defendant appeals. The facts are in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The bill in this cause was filed to restrain a private nuisance. The chief complaint made by it was that defendant, wdio was the owner of a saw-mill and foundry on the waters of a stream which empties into Grand Traverse Bay, was accustomed to cast the sawdust into the stream, whereby the water was rendered ■ unfit for use, the valuable fish therein destroyed or driven away, and complainant’s dam for his own mill below gradually filled up. A further grievance, but one which the bill made less prominent, was, that the mill-dam of defendant at times detained the water unreasonably, and at other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dumont v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Tampa Waterworks Co. v. ClineSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  4. Woodin v. WentworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Penn American Plate Glass Co. v. SchwinnIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API