Legal Opinion
Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided October 18, 1971No. Civ. A. 71-306, 70-968, 69-1096, 68-705, 70-14, 70-250, 70-358, 70-386, 70-493, 70-628, 70-683, 71-88, 71-90, 71-92, 71-94, 71-96, 71-98, 71-100, 71-102, 71-126, 69-777, 70-189, 70-295, 70-385, 70-391, 70-622, 70-677, 71-87, 71-89, 71-91, 71-93, 71-95, 71-97, 71-99, 71-101, 71-115, 71-127, and 71-283PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction by defendants Moulinage et Retorderie de Chavanoz (referred to hereinafter as “Chavanoz”) and Ateliers Roannais de Construction Textiles (referred to hereinafter as “ARCT-Franee”) invite decision in this forum. The issue projected is whether, under the facts displayed before this court the South Carolina contacts of Chavanoz and ARTC-France are of such sufficiency in kind and extent, such quality and nature, to give this court that in personam jurisdiction to allow plaintiff Duplan Corporation, et al, and certain…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Japan Gas Lighter Association v. Ronson Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
- Hitt v. Nissan Motor Company, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1975
- CB ASKINS v. Firedoor Corp. of Fla.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Roorda v. VOLKSWAGENWERK, AGDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
- David v. National Lampoon, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.