Legal Opinion
State v. Heston
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 8, 1972No. 71-533PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
The central issue in this appeal by the state is whether the handwriting exemplar was the product of an invalid arrest and thus inadmissible. Related issues raised by defendant in the Court of Appeals are whether the exemplar was coerced, whether its admission in evidence violated defendant’s Fifth Amendment priv*155ilege against self-incrimination, and whether in the cir-cnmstances presented a warrant should have been obtained.
As to the latter issue, whether a warrant should have been obtained, in State v. Woodards (1966), 6 Ohio St. 2d 14, 20, this court stated that:
“Under certain…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- State v. BrandenburgOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. FinchOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. HackneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. WoodsOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. OjileOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.