Legal Opinion

Sattler v. City of New York Commission on Human Rights

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*190OPINION OF THE COURT

Peter P. Rosato, J.

By way of order to show cause dated January 2, 1990, petitioner, a dentist, brings on a proceeding pursuant to section 8-110 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York to set aside and vacate respondent’s decision and order dated November 30, 1989 finding petitioner to have committed an unlawful discriminatory practice in violation of the New York City Human Rights Law in the matter entitled McCoury v Sattler (complaint No. GA-00097031688-DN).

Respondent opposes the instant petition and also brings on a cross motion to enforce the Commission’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. New York State Club Ass'n v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. City of New York v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Batavia Lodge No. 196 v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Pace College v. Commission on Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sattler v. City of New York Commission on Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. (1996), Maryland Attorney General Reports1996
  3. Elstein v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Nisha Desai et al. v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API