Legal Opinion

I.D.M. v. State, Department of Children & Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 15, 2000No. 2D00-1230PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Acting Chief Judge.

V.M. (the Mother) challenges the trial court’s orders refusing to allow her to withdraw her consent to the dependency of I.D.M. and adjudicating I.D.M. dependent. Because the trial court failed to determine that the Mother’s consent was given voluntarily and with a full understanding of the possible consequences of the consent, we reverse.

Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.325(c) requires the trial court to make specific findings before accepting a consent to dependency. The rule states in pertinent part:

The court shall determine that any admission or consent to a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Interest of CMDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Bailey v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHABILITATIVEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. B.G. v. Department of Children & Family ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Department of Children & Families v. P.C.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. In Re BGDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API