Legal Opinion
John A. Breda v. Alan M. Scott Galton, Popick & Scott
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 3, 1993No. 91-36300PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRIS, Circuit Judge:
John A. Breda brought suit against Alan M. Scott and Scott’s former law firm, Galton, Popick & Scott, for legal malpractice. The district court granted summary judgment for Scott, holding that the attorneys were immune from liability under 29 U.S.C. § 185(b), Section 301(b) of the Labor Management Relations Act. Breda appeals.
We affirm.
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., 873 F.2d 1338, 1339-40 (9th Cir.1989). Breda claims that Scott mishandled his union grievance over his discharge from the Oregon Symphony…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- James E. Peterson v. Harold Kennedy, Richard A. Berthelsen, and National Football League Players AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Paul E. Montplaisir v. Richard J. LeightonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gisela Carino v. Marc Stefan, Esq Butsavage & Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Arnold v. Air Midwest, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Service Employees International Union v. National Union of Healthcare WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Best v. RomeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- McDevitt v. GuentherDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.