Fisher v. Fisher
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Associate Justice.
The principal issue presented in this case is whether the appellee should have a reformation of the deed she received from the appellant. This deed was part of a property settlement between them preceding their divorce. Following the divorce appellant instituted this suit alleging that he and the appellee owned twenty-six acres as tenants by the entirety. He asked for partition thereof and for his.proper share of the rents collected by the appellee. In her answer appellee denied his assertions. By cross-complaint she contends that she is the sole owner of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Welch v. WelchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Murphy v. OsborneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Carrigan v. CarriganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Orr v. OrrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- May v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- C.R.T., Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- JeToCo Corp. v. Hailey Sales Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Minton v. McGowanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Hurst v. HurstSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.