Legal Opinion

Bump v. Cooper

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Benton county: R. S. Bean, judge.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.

This was an action to recover money, founded upon a written contract. The contract, omitting immaterial parts, *82is as follows: That “the party of the first part (plaintiff Bump) does hereby agree to sell and doth sell and agree to deliver, or to cause to be delivered, to the party of- the second part (defendant Cooper) all her crop of hops, the growth of the year 1888, the said hops to be of good first quality, well baled and put up in good merchantable order and condition, in bales of about one hundred and eighty-four pounds, etc.; said hops to be delivered in lots of not less than eight…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Steiger v. FronhoferOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Yamaoka v. KloeberWashington Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API