Legal Opinion

Nowell v. Neal

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1959No. 456PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

Plaintiff took no exceptions to the findings of fact. Her sole assignment of error reads:

“The plaintiff excepted to and assigns as error THE JUDGMENT AND THE SIGNING THEREOF; THE ORDER AND THE SIGNING THEREOF.”

This assignment raises only these questions: (1) Did the judge err in refusing to set aside the verdict rendered at the May 1955 Term and the judgment based thereon which had been affirmed by this Court; and (2) Do the facts found by the court support the order entered?

The basic reason underlying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the issues raised at the trial had at the May 1955…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Renfro v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State v. . OwenbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Adams Ex Rel. Adams v. Beaty Service Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Moore v. . HarkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Ackerman v. KaufmanArizona Supreme Court · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. FlemingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API