Nowell v. Neal
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
Plaintiff took no exceptions to the findings of fact. Her sole assignment of error reads:
“The plaintiff excepted to and assigns as error THE JUDGMENT AND THE SIGNING THEREOF; THE ORDER AND THE SIGNING THEREOF.”
This assignment raises only these questions: (1) Did the judge err in refusing to set aside the verdict rendered at the May 1955 Term and the judgment based thereon which had been affirmed by this Court; and (2) Do the facts found by the court support the order entered?
The basic reason underlying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the issues raised at the trial had at the May 1955…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Renfro v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. . OwenbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Adams Ex Rel. Adams v. Beaty Service Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Moore v. . HarkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Ackerman v. KaufmanArizona Supreme Court · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. FlemingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.