Legal Opinion

Cimini v. Cimini

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 17, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mark Cimini appeals from a judgment of a single justice of this court denying his “Request for Interlocutory Relief” from certain rulings in the Probate and Family Court. In asking for review of these interlocutory rulings, the petitioner invokes this court’s general superintendence powers. See G. L. c. 211, § 3. The petitioner’s claims do not warrant the extraordinary relief of G. L. c. 211, § 3, and we therefore affirm the single justice’s judgment.

General superintendence relief is properly denied where “there are other routes by which the petitioning party may adequately seek relief.”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Soja v. T. P. Sampson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Foley v. Lowell Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Sabree v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Afrasiabi v. RooneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Aktas v. AktasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API