Legal Opinion

Williams v. Pilgrim Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 29, 1982No. 2258PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

• Appellant contends that the lower court erred in granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment. Because triable issues of fact remain, we reverse and remand for trial.

On September 21, 1977, appellees, beneficiaries of several life insurance policies issued by appellant, sued to recover additional funds arising from the policies’ double indemnity clauses as a result of the insured’s death by gunshot wound. Upon the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, the lower court granted judgment for appellees. This appeal followed.

Summary judgment shall be granted if the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. S. J. Groves & Sons Company v. Ohio Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  3. Granthum v. Textile Machine WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Martin v. Capital Cities Media, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Rossi v. Pennsylvania State UniversitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Salerno v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API