Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. O'Donnell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1937No. 26592. En BancPublished

1DissentHolcomb, J.

(dissenting) — -In my opinion, there was no prejudicial error in the trial of this case by the remarks of the prosecutor in his opening statement to the jury, nor is it good legal logic to say:

“The appellants are safely held in the King county prison without bail and may be tried again without great inconvenience to the state, except in the matter of expense.”

The majority also say:

“If, on the other hand, we condone the admittedly irregular procedure occurring in the trial, ‘ ’Twill be recorded for a precedent, And many an error, by the same example Will rush into the state’.”

In this case, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State v. PepoonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State v. LindbergWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State v. NavoneWashington Supreme Court · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API