Legal Opinion
People v. Ortega
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 23, 2010No. 162, 194PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Lippman.
The common issue presented by these appeals is whether certain statements appearing in medical records were properly admitted at trial as relevant to diagnosis and treatment under the business records exception to the hearsay rule. We find no reversible error in either case and uphold the convictions.
*614 People v Benston
Defendant, who was without another place to live, had been residing in the spare bedroom in complainant’s apartment, at her invitation. Although their relationship was platonic at that time, they had been involved in a romantic relationship…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Williams v. AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- People v. GreenleeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. CacceseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. SwingerCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- People v. SpicolaNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. BlackmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. PhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. BahrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.