Legal Opinion

Wilczak v. Ruda & Capozzi, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1994PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and in declaring that defendant insurance company (insurer) had a duty to defend and indemnify codefendants with respect to all causes of action alleged in plaintiffs’ complaint. The issue is whether the insurer’s almost two-month delay in disclaiming coverage, following late notice by the insured, is unreasonable as a matter of law.

*945In order to disclaim liability or deny coverage, an insurer is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hartford Insurance v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Allstate Insurance v. GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Allstate Insurance v. MoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. In Re the Arbitration Between Allstate Insurance & FrankNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. 2540 Associates, Inc. v. Assicurazioni Generali, S.p.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Allegany Co-op Insurance v. KohorstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
  4. U.S. Underwriters Insurance v. Congregation B'nai IsraelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  5. Vecchiarelli v. Continental InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API