United States v. Charles H. Carter
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FAHY, Senior Circuit Judge:
The appeal is from a conviction of robbery in violation of 22 D.C.Code § 2901 (Supp. V, 1972). An identification question is presented, which includes a challenge to the adequacy of the instruction to the jury. No objection to the instruction as given, however, was made at trial. Considering the one given with the evidence as a whole,, no plain error affecting a substantial right appears. We accordingly are not required to consider further this phase of the case. Rule 52, F.R.Crim.P.
A more serious problem grows out of the manner in which the Assistant United States…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. Dewey BobbittCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- United States v. Guillermo Novo Sampol, United States of America v. Alvin Ross Diaz, United States of America v. Ignacio Novo SampolCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- United States v. Gregory O. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Michael FosherCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Middleton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.