Legal Opinion

Utah Fuel Co. v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1921No. 3716PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Proceedings under the Industrial Commission Act, for compensation for injuries to Clyde Parry, opposed by the Utah Fuel Company, employer. Compensation was awarded by the Industrial Commission, and the employer obtained a writ of review.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The plaintiff owns and operates a coal mine in this state. One Clyde Parry, on the 25th day of March, 1921, while employed by the plaintiff in its coal mine, and in the course of his employment, sustained personal injuries by reason of which he was prevented from continuing his employment.

The plaintiff and said Parry both were subject to the provisions of our Industrial Commission Act Comp. Laws 1917, *48§ 3061 et seq.), tbe plaintiff being wbat is called a self-insurer under tbe act.

On tbe 22d day of June, 1921, the Commission, by some means not disclosed by tbe record, having taken…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Road Commission v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  2. North Beck Mining Co. v. Industrial Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Morrison-Merrill & Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Andrew F. Mahony Co. v. MarshallDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1931
  3. Color Country Management v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  4. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  5. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Ind. Com.Utah Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API