Malgor v. Royal Insurance

OdliN, Judge,

delivered tbe following opinion:

Tbe present controversy involves exceptions filed by counsel for tbe libellants to twelve of tbe thirteen interrogatories propounded by. counsel for tbe libellee. Interrogatory No. 8 is omitted from tbis opinion, because tbe same bas been answered. Tbe remaining interrogatories are as follows:—

“First interrogatory. State wbetber tbe partnership Malgor, Gonzalez & Company, S. en C. is still in existence and, if so, who are tbe present partners.

Second interrogatory. State wbetber tbe power and authority from respondent to Sobrinos de Ezquiaga…