Legal Opinion

CASTILLO ANGULO

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2018No. ID 3913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

27 I&N Dec. 194

(BIA 2018) Interim Decision #3913 Matter of Rosalina CASTILLO ANGULO, Respondent Decided January 29, 2018 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) In removal proceedings arising within the jurisdiction of the United States Courts of Appeals for the Fifth and Ninth Circuits, an alien who was “waved through” a port of entry has established an admission “in any status” within the meaning of section 240A(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(2) (2012). Tula-Rubio v. Lynch,

787 F.3d 288

(5th…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. H-G-GBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2019
  2. Alejandra Montesinos Cisneros v. Todd BlancheCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API