Uris v. Brackett Realty Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the lienor/ Harris H. Ur is, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 29th day of January, 1906, canceling his notice of lien because of failure to prosecute the same pursuant to a notice given by the owner as prescribed in section 3417 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
Laughlin, J.:
On the 20th day of 'November, 1905, the appellant filed with the clerk of the county of New York a mechanic’s lien against premises owned by the Brackett Bealty Company for work done and materials furnished. Four days later the lien was canceled by an order made on the application of the Brackett Bealty Company showing that it had executed an undertaking with a surety pursuant to the provisions of subdivision 4 of section 18 of the Lien Law (Laws of 1897, chap. 418), conditioned, as prescribed by law, for the payment of any judgment that may be rendered against the property for…
2Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Thirty-fifth Street & Fifth Avenue Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- In re HurwitzNew York Supreme Court · 1908
- In re GreinesNew York Supreme Court · 1908