Rider v. Regan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. J. M. Sea well, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1DissentHenshaw, J.
I dissent, under the conviction that the act in question is unconstitutional. Section 1 of that act is as follows: “In case of a homestead, if either the husband or the wife shall become-hopelessly insane, upon application of the husband or wife not insane to the probate court of the county in which said homestead is situated, and upon due proof' of such insanity, the court may make an order permitting the husband or wife not insane to sell or convey or mortgage such homestead.”
Section 2 provides for publication and service of notice of the application.
Section 3 makes necessary the filing of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rice v. ParkmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1820
- Heidenheimer v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Forbes v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1869
- Brenham v. DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.