Legal Opinion

Ljungquist v. Hartmetz

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided April 15, 1907Published

Motion to correct judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtWadhams, J.

Where the complaint is dismissed as to a defendant who answered separately, such defendant is not entitled to costs, as a matter of course, provided the plaintiff *88is entitled to costs against one or more defendants. In such case costs may be awarded in the discretion of the court. Code Civ. Pro., § 3229. As no application for an award of costs was made in this case, the judgment entered improperly awarded costs in favor of the defendant. The proper remedy in such case is an order striking from the judgment docketed and entered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff that portion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eastman v. GrayNew York Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API