Legal Opinion

Stonebrook Hillsboro, L.L.C. v. Flavel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 15, 2003No. C002304EV; A111874PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

In this statutory forcible entry and detainer (FED) proceeding, the trial court entered judgment for plaintiff Stonebrook Suites-Hillsboro, awarding plaintiff the premises and denying defendants’ counterclaims. Defendants appeal, raising numerous assignments of error. We reject all of the assignments and write only to address defendants’ contention that plaintiff failed to give proper notice of its intention to terminate the tenancy. Because we conclude that plaintiff gave sufficient notice, we affirm.

Defendants, Harry and Mary Flavel, who are brother and sister, shared adjoining rooms in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Illingworth v. BushongOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Napolski v. ChampneyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Amatisto v. PazCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Bend Tarp and Liner, Inc. v. BundyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Ellsworth v. GladdenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Greene v. HRENCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Hathaway v. B & J Property Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. Lopez v. KilbourneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API