Legal Opinion
Professional Insurance Management v. Ohio Casualty Group of Insurance Companies (In re Professional Insurance Management)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 1, 2002No. 00-5201PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
The primary issue presented by this appeal, stemming from a tortured procedural *272mess, is whether an insurance company must turn over to its terminated agent $259,315.95 in accrued commissions and interest, plus additional commissions that continue to be earned. The answer hinges on the interpretation of New Jersey’s Agency Termination Statute found at N.J. Stat. Ann. § 17:22-6.14a (West 2000), a matter of first impression in this Court.1 Specifically, the parties call upon us to resolve the question of whether The Ohio Casualty Group of Insurance…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Barr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- In re Amatex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. MaricopaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
- In Re Professional Insurance Management, Debtor. Professional Insurance Management v. The Ohio Casualty Group of Insurance Companies the Ohio Casualty Insurance Ohio Life Insurance Company Ohio Security Insurance Company and Ocasco Budget West American Insurance Company American Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- KRAEMER v. ROSTRAVER TOWNSHIPDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025