Legal Opinion
Kramer v. Mahneck
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided January 5, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I stated my views at the conclusion of this case, as follows:
"I think it might be wise for me to state my view of the facts in this case at the present time, even if I find upon completion of said statement that I will not now render my final opinion.
"The complainant and the defendant were co-employes at one of the prominent hotels in Atlantic City, the complainant as manager of the laundry, the defendant as a parlor maid.
"The complainant had a room and lived, or at least had the room for the purpose of occupancy, at the hotel. They were very friendly. I will refer to the extent of that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Griffith v. BenzingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Kelso v. KelsoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
- Kelso v. KelsoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Texas Co. v. Di GaetanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Renrick v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Knutsen v. BROWNNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Takach v. RadiceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.