Hadnot v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Appellant urges again that his conviction cannot be sustained upon the ground that the State witnesses admitted that they went with appellant on the occasion in question, contributed to the purchase of the liquor alleged to have been transported, and then went back with appellant in his car over the highway. He insists that they thus became and were accomplices. We again call attention to the fact that by express' provision of our statute purchasers and transporters of intoxicating liquor, while accomplices, may give testimony which will support a…