Legal Opinion

Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. Davidson's Administrator

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 8, 1916PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court, Part II, of the city of Richmond, in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

The plaintiff’s intestate, a little boy five years of age, was killed by a street car owned and operated by the Virginia Railway and Power Company. In an action against the company, charging that his death was due to the defendant’s negligence, there was a judgment for the plaintiff, which is before us upon a writ of error.

There were eight assignments of error. The first three related to the giving or refusing of instructions to the jury, and may be disposed of without any extended discussion, except as to instruction No. 3 given for the plaintiff, and an unnumbered instruction asked for by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zucker v. . WhitridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. First National Bank v. StraitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. Big Stone Gap Iron Co. v. KetronSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. Rice's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
  5. National Novelty Import Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shelton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Aronovitch v. AyresSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
  3. Gunter's Adm'r v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  4. Washington-Virginia Railway Co. v. DeahlSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  5. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. HardySupreme Court of Virginia · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API