Legal Opinion · Dissent

Katz v. New York City Loft Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1990Published

1Dissent

Kupferman, J. P.,

dissents in a memorandum as follows: I would grant the petition and annul the determination of the New York City Loft Board.

The legislative findings in section 280 of the Multiple Dwelling Law make it clear that the statute is designed to address "the increasing number of conversions of commercial and manufacturing loft buildings to residential use without compliance with applicable building codes and laws and without compliance with local laws regarding minimum housing maintenance standards”.

The purpose of the Loft Conversion Law was to legitimize residential use of former…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spring Realty Co. v. New York City Loft BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Vlachos v. New York City Loft BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API