Legal Opinion

The Ferax

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 15, 1849No. Case No. 4,737PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SPRAGUE, District Judge,

delivered his opinion substantially as follows:

This is an important question. • It depends mainly upon the meaning of the term “construction” in the statute; for the libellant’s work, being in the nature of alteration, cannot well be 'treated as “repair,” which is restoration. The statute is recent, and the word has been the subject of..no legal de?, termination. We must look to the intention of the legislature. The reason of the statute would make it apply to alterations and reconstructions, as well as to the original' construction; and if the latter only had been…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Donnell v. StarlightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API