Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nebraska Mil-Nic, Inc. v. Hall County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1972No. 37983Published

1DissentClinton, J.

I dissent from the overruling of the motion for rehearing. I have concluded that the opinion which we adopted in the above case is patently in error and should be withdrawn and an opinion reaching the opposite results should be adopted — or at the very least that the motion for rehearing should be granted. There are several reasons for my position.(1) In the above- case we held the applicable statute of limitations was section 18-1717, R. R. S. 1943. A rereading of this statute convinces me that by its terms it has no application to refunds of a void tax, the assessment of which as the result…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Payne v. OstrusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  2. O'Malley v. SimsArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Matthews v. Travelers Indemnity Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. of Mexico v. GonzalezArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Board of Educational Lands and Funds v. GillettNebraska Supreme Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API