Legal Opinion

City of Tyler v. ARP NURSERY COMPANY

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 5, 1970No. 463PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

This is a condemnation case brought under the provisions of Art. 3264 et seq., Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Civ.St. Condemnor, City of Tyler, filed its petition in condemnation seeking to condemn the surface estate only upon three contiguous tracts of land containing 168 acres owned by condemnees, L. A. Dean and S. Clark Kidd, doing business as Arp Nursery Company. The purpose of the taking was for the construction of a lake to improve the City’s water supply. Special Commissioners appointed by the County Judge of Smith County awarded the condemnees-landowners $29,-024.00 for the taking of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State v. CarpenterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1936
  3. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation District v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Texas Power & Light Company v. ColeTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  5. City of Los Angeles v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hanford-Southport, LLC. v. City of San Antonio, Acting by and Through the San Antonio Water System, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012
  2. City of Tyler v. ARP NURSERY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Lansdowne v. Beacon Journal Publishing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API