Legal Opinion

Mobley v. Faircloth

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 12, 1932No. 8926PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

The ruling made in the headnotes is in response to a question certified by the Court of Appeals. In Shannon v. Mobley, 166 Ga. 430 (10) (143 S. E. 582), this court dealt with substantially the same question. The superintendent of banks *809brought suit against the officers and directors of a bank, alleging violation of the banking laws in making worthless loans. There was a demurrer to the petition, on the ground that more than four years had elapsed from the making of the loan to the filing of the suit, and therefore the suit was barred by the statute of limitations. In that case it appeared…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Teasley v. BradleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Anderson v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Kirkley v. SharpSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Frost v. ArnaudSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  5. Short v. MathisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bank of Jonesboro v. CarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. HudsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1987
  3. Resolution Trust Corporation v. James M. Artley, Third-Party International Insurance Company, Inc., Third-Party the Cincinnati Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. White v. Federal Deposit Ins. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  5. Gormley v. SlicerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API