Legal Opinion

York v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 10, 1932No. CR 3820PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The bill of exceptions in the instant case is identical with the one held insufficient in the case of Ward v. State, 135 Ark. 259, 204 S.W. 971. In this case, as in that the bill of exceptions was signed by the prosecuting attorney and counsel for appellant, but had not been submitted to nor approved by the trial judge. The appellant in each case had been convicted of a felony. It was there held that it is necessary that a bill of exceptions in a case where defendant has been convicted of a felony be signed by the trial judge, and that the bill of exceptions did not become a part of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holliman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API