Legal Opinion

Earnest v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 20, 1990No. 09-88-333 CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURGESS, Justice.

A jury found David Ray Earnest guilty of murder and assessed punishment at confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections for life and a $10,000 fine. Appellant urges two points of error.

Point of error one avers a blood sample was improperly admitted into evidence. Appellant claims the state failed to establish the chain of custody of the sample of the victim’s blood. The victim, Lucinda S. Giles, was appellant’s common law spouse. She had left him approximately six months before she was beaten or kicked to death. Appellant called the emergency service and was at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Marquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Mays v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Levi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Gordon Donald v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API