Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 21, 1929No. 8061Published

1ConcurrenceBooth, Circuit Judge

I concur in the foregoing opinion, and would simply add that the question whether the judgment of the trial court was supported by the stipulated facts has been reviewed by this court pursuant to the rule established in the following eases: Wayne County v. Kennicott, 103 U. S. 554, 26 L. Ed. 486; Lehnen v. Dickson, 148 U. S. 71, 73, 13 S. Ct. 481 (37 L. Ed. 373); Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Kelly, 114 F. 268 (C. C. A. 8); Hipple v. Bates County, 223 F. 22 (C. C. A. 8); Kirkman v. Farmers’ Sav. Bank, 28 F.(2d) 857 (C. C. A. 8); Blair v. United States (C. C. A.) 241 F. 217, 230.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lehnen v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Supervisors v. KennicottSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Mutual Life Ins. v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  4. Blair v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
  5. Hipple v. Bates CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API