Legal Opinion

In Re Mutual Funds Investment Litigation

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 20, 2010No. 04-MD-15863, 04-CV-518PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.

Fund Derivative Plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”) have sued Janus Capital Management (“JCM”) and Janus Distributors LLC (“JD”) under Section 36(b) of the Invest ment Company Act (“ICA”), 15 U.S.C. § 80a-35(b). Defendants have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons explained below, this motion will be granted.

I

“Janus Defendants” are JCM and JD. (Fund Derivative Pl.’s Mem. of Law in Opp. to Janus Def.’s Mot. for Summ. J. (“PL’s Mem.”) 1 n. 1.) JCM is an “investment adviser to the Janus family of mutual funds” (“Janus Funds”), and JD is “an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Zinkand v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  3. In Re Mutual Funds Investment LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
  4. Galfand v. Chestnutt Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. In Re Mutual Funds Inv. LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. RazmilovicDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API