Legal Opinion

Molinari v. Maryland

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 7, 1924No. 127; No. 480PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. Mr. Clarence Lippel, with whom Mr. Arch A. Young and Mr. Carl G. Mullin were on the brief, for plaintiff in error in No. 127. Mr. Saul Praeger, with whom Mr. Joseph N. Ülman and Mr. G. Tyler Smith were, on the brief, for plaintiff in error in No. 480. Mr. Alexander Armstrong and ■ Mr. Lindsay C. Spencer appeared for defendant in error.

Affirmed with costs upon, the authority of: (1) Vigliotti v. Pennsylvania, 258 U. S. 403; (2) Forsyth v. Hammond, 166 U. S. 506, 518; Commissioners v. Bancroft, 203 U. S. 112, 118-119; St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Arkansas, 235 U. S. 350, 362.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Forsyth v. HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Vigliotti v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Commissioners of Wicomico County v. BancroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barnes v. PeopleSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Colora v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1925