Legal Opinion
In Re Ali
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 6, 1986No. 13-20284PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Chief Judge:
The focus of our current inquiry is whether we should grant a debtors’ motion to reopen a chapter 7 case so that the debtors may add an additional creditor. On the basis of the reasons expressed below, we conclude that the motion should be granted.
The facts of this dispute are as follows: 1 The debtors filed a petition for relief under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”) in 1983. With the petition the debtors also filed a list of their creditors as is required by Bankruptcy Rule 1007(a)(1). In due course the debtors obtained a discharge of their…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harold J. Hawkins and Eugenia B. Hawkins v. Landmark Finance Company, in Re Harold J. Hawkins and Eugenia B. Hawkins, DebtorsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- In Re JohnsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 1985
- In Re MinniefieldUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1984
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re QuackenbosUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re CrullUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1989
- In Re BeshenskyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1987
- Burch v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n (In Re Burch)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- In Re MaddoxUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.