Legal Opinion

Meyer's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 18, 1940No. 157PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

The deficiency which the Board of Tax Appeals redetermined and which the petitioner is seeking to have set aside was brought about by disallowing two items as deductions from the gross estate of the decedent. One was the amount of the arrears, due at his death, to a former wife under a separation agreement; and the second *368was the commuted value of additional payments due her under the agreement during the remainder of her life.

It is clear and undisputed that both sums were debts owing because the decedent had promised to pay and decision must turn upon whether they were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Taft v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Porter v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  5. Empire Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. MaresiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Glen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
  3. Helvering v. United States Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate of Myles C. Watson, Garden City Bank & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  5. Adriance v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API