Legal Opinion
State v. Koskela
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1983No. Crim. 881PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PEDERSON, Justice.
In a trial to the court, Koskela was convicted of robbery in violation of § 12.1-03-01 and § 12.1-22-01, NDCC. Koskela appealed from the judgment of conviction,1 claiming that police officers lacked probable cause to stop him and that discovery of evidence was the result of an unreasonable search and seizure prohibited by the Fourth and the Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and by Section 8 of the North Dakota Constitution. We affirm.
On November 12,1981, Fargo Police Officer Peter Graber was on a routine patrol when he heard, over his police radio, that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. GreggNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. FieldsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. GarrettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Richter v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. NickelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.