Neal v. Akers

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs and defendants, having agreed that plaintiffs should sell defendants’ land at auction, signed an instrument, which was intended to embody the details, including plaintiffs’ compensation. The paper, dated July 28, 1919, contained these provisions as to compensation of the agents, which for convenience we number 1, 2, 3, and 4:(1) “It is further agreed by all parties of this contract that in consideration of the services rendered and expenses incurred by the said party of the first part, in advertisement and conducting said sales, that they, the said party of the…